How much should you revise?
I’m always curious how other authors answer this question. And this spring, at a Bodleian Library’s exhibition on the Shelleys, I had a chance to study how two authors revised in the days before typewriters (to say nothing of computers).*** Mary and Percy Bysshe Shelley were a star-crossed pair if there ever was one, and it turns out they had entirely different approaches to revision.
Here is a page from Mary Shelley’s draft of Frankenstein:
Look at those neat lines flowing across the page! And note the minimal changes to the manuscript. A word here, a sentence there — and this was one of the messier pages I saw.
What’s most interesting is that the edits were generally written in her husband’s hand.
But if Percy Bysshe Shelley was tough on Mary’s work, he was far harder on his own. He won my heart with this heavily lined and be-scribbled draft of his sonnet Ozymandias:
Wholesale “re-visioning” here! And some great doodling, too. (If you don’t know the sonnet, it’s wonderful, and well worth the short time it takes to read. You can find it here.)
Here’s another one of his drafts:
Doodling seems to have been part of his method. I’m thinking I might try giving it a try, too.
I rarely write anything as clean as Mary Shelley’s first draft of Frankenstein. So it’s reassuring to see that Percy Bysshe was willing to cut his first drafts to shreds, too.
***I caught the Bodleian exhibit on one of its last days, but a version of it will travel to the New York Public Library in February 2012. And you can visit the online version of the show here, complete with Percy’s raisin plate and Mary’s hair. How can you resist?!
#
Alchemy Pie 
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
Fascinating! I love that Percy was a doodler. It drives me nuts, though, that people want to claim the fact that he edited Mary as a sign that he is largely responsible for the genius of her work, when what he did was no more than an editor does today.
I had a cat named Ozymandias. A horrible cat.
Thanks for sharing these!
A horrible cat
A King of Kings kind of cat? Come to think of it, “Look upon my works, ye mighty and despair” would make a good horrible cat motto.
And I’m right there with you on the editing question. The work seems so clearly Mary’s, from theme to execution. And most of the edits are really quite minor — spelling corrections, a slight change of adjective. We should all be so lucky!
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
I think you might get lost in some of my pages, too! I have been known to cross, double-cross and lay waste to entire chapters. Just can’t leave ’em alone.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Whoa, Mary was a tidy first-drafter. But whoa, also, to Percy’s marked-up pages; I’d get lost in all that.
Very cool, Amy. Thank you for sharing.
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
Loved seeing these drafts! I’ve always wondered if and how writers from the past would write differently if they were able to draft on computers instead of doing everything in longhand.
Of course I loved Shelley’s raisin plate :).
I figured that raisin plate would get you, Jama. 😉
I think I’m more of a reviser because I write on a computer. But maybe I would’ve been anyway? At any rate I get the sense that Percy Bysshe would’ve loved cut and paste. But alas, there’s no doodling on a laptop…
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
Glad to know I have company! If I ever write a book that flows as smoothly as Mary’s manuscript, I’ll be surprised.
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
I revise much more like Percy, too. Mary makes me jealous. 🙂
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
What a family! Thank you for the peek into them and the exhibit. I have loved Ozymandius since high school, for our teacher loved it, and wonderful to see the drawings and scratch outs. I, too, think I revise more since I can write on the computer. It’s one thing to make changes on a poem, another to make changes on a novel — when you know you’d have so much to retype.
So glad you enjoyed this, Jeannine! And yes, what a family.
I think you’re right about the computer changing novelists more than poets. Cut and paste is a godsend for novels and all longer form works. A crutch, too, I guess, but I wouldn’t want to go back to the typewriter days.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
So good to see you here, Kit. I wish I could follow your constant-revision method, especially as I seem to remember you are mostly where you want to be by the end. But whenever I try, I start going round in circles. Not that I don’t go round in circles plenty as it is, but at least I make some sort of progress, too.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
Yes, the truth is that I have no idea how much of a reviser I am, because I write even the first draft on the computer and revise constantly as I go. I do save deleted material in a separate file, which is a bit of a clue, but that’s more at the paragraph level. Word choices, half-written sentences that I backspaced over and began again–of that kind of change I keep no record.
Your remark about a horrible cat motto made me cackle. And I enjoyed reading the Ozymandius again.
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm”
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm”
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm”
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm”
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm”
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm“
I will definitely check that out! — PL
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
I think it’s spelled “”Ozymandias”.
Love the doodle — the pyramid looming in the distance behind the tree is intriguing.
I wonder what Mary Shelley would make of the incredible popularity and longevity of her “Modern Prometheus”… and the fact that the monster made from reanimated dead flesh is now almost universally (and erroneously) known as “Frankenstein”? — PL
Can’t believe I missed that typo! Thanks, Peter. I’ll fix it above.
And I thought you’d like that doodle. As for Mary, I think she’d be very pleased her work is still read. Though disturbed, perhaps, by some of the modern developments that continue to make its themes relevant. (And yes, she’d probably be a bit dismayed that everyone thinks that Frankenstein is the monster.)
Ozymandias
Amy, I only know how that name is spelled because of a comic book, believe it or not — Alan Moore’s great series “Watchmen”, which features a superhero character who has adopted that name for himself.
However, seeing it mentioned here made me track down the original poem, which I don’t think I’d ever read in its entirety before. Very evocative! — PL
Re: Ozymandias
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…
One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm
Re: “Watchmen”
“amygreenfield wrote:
I’ve heard of “Watchmen” but not read it. A gap in my education…”
Probably not a gap which NEEDS to be filled, but it could be fun. “Watchmen” is available in a variety of foams, including a nice graphic novel-style collection.
There were lots of them printed to go along with the marketing of the movie adaptation a couple of years ago. (And that movie was a pretty decent — not perfect — adaptation of the comics.)
“One of the fun facts about “Ozymandias” the poem is that Shelley had a friend, Horace Smith, who wrote on the same subject. (They appear to have had some kind of friendly dare going on.) Smith’s poem hasn’t gone the distance, but you can read it here, if you’re interested: http://www.benybont.co.uk/another/horace.htm”
I will definitely check that out! — PL